Comments on: Changes Afoot http://blog.war-on-ice.com/changes-afoot/ Your site for modern hockey analytics Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:11:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0 By: Examining The Drivers of Score Effects I: Shooting and Save Percentage | puck++ http://blog.war-on-ice.com/changes-afoot/#comment-110 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:47:55 +0000 http://blog.war-on-ice.com/?p=221#comment-110 […] the distribution of their shots in generally the same, with the % of shots taken from the high danger zone unchanged between the -2, -1 and tied score states. There is some shift to taking more low danger […]

]]> By: Breakdown of Price and Hammond (So Far) - Today's Slapshot http://blog.war-on-ice.com/changes-afoot/#comment-72 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:01:26 +0000 http://blog.war-on-ice.com/?p=221#comment-72 […] Here’s a look at Andrew Hammond and Carey Price and their puck-stopping rates in the low, medium, and high danger zones. (For more on the zones, check here). […]

]]> By: Predicting Save Percentage: Dangers Zones and Shot Volumes | puck++ http://blog.war-on-ice.com/changes-afoot/#comment-51 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:34:44 +0000 http://blog.war-on-ice.com/?p=221#comment-51 […] of graphs showing the correlation between a goalie’s save percentage in each of the War-On-Ice danger zones and their overall success rate. Conor found that (unsurprisingly) a goalie’s performance on high […]

]]> By: The Road To WAR, Part 6: Rate-Based Event Adjustments For Score Effects, Home Advantage and Event Count Bias | WAR On Ice: The Blog http://blog.war-on-ice.com/changes-afoot/#comment-15 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:03:20 +0000 http://blog.war-on-ice.com/?p=221#comment-15 […] repeated this procedure by dividing events by “danger zone” since we expected the event count to be more biased the longer the shot, since we though this would […]

]]>